Category Archives: News

Space Solar Power

Space solar power appears to offer the cleanest option for generating the large quantities of electricity needed by a progressive civilization. Among other options for power generation, none has such benign environmental impact or is so safe. Space solar power would forestall nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. It prevents the environmental damage of mining uranium and fossil fuels. Satellite solar power is particularly attractive for countries like China which depend on coal-fired power stations for most of their electrical capacity because coal smoke reduces China’s food production by an estimated 10%. The physics of the power transmission preclude its use as a weapon. What is needed is a demonstration of economic feasibility.

The market worldwide for base load electrical power generating stations is now $400 billion per year, and that number will increase for decades. If we develop a method to build satellite solar power stations that can deliver electricity at competitive rates, there could be a nearly $400 billion per year annual market for sales of the power stations alone.

The first designs for power satellites used radiofrequency power transmission. Thirty years ago NASA demonstrated radio frequency power transmission efficiency comparable to power transmission over long terrestrial power lines. The power satellite transmitting antenna must be one kilometer in diameter to achieve that efficiency. The development cost and capital cost of such large systems made a powersat construction program too risky to undertake. Advances in laser power transmission make it possible to build smaller power stations with much lower capital and development costs. The cost of electricity should be competitive with ground-based solar in places with an adverse climates. Such a laser transmission system is described by SSI researcher Prof. Martin Hoffert.

Generating electricity in space and transmitting it to end-users on the Earth offers significant benefits over ground-based solar power. The sun shines continuously in geostationary orbit, except for two brief periods during the equinoxes. Solar power in space is not reflected by clouds, nor is it attenuated by the atmosphere. A power station in high orbit receives more than four times as much energy as the best ground-based sites and about six times more than the average site. To provide continuous power, a ground-based solar power installation requires electrical storage backup roughly equal in cost to the cost of the generating equipment. So the capital cost of ground-based solar power should be much more expensive than the capital cost, excluding transportation, of mature satellite solar power. The receiving stations can be located close to the electricity demand and so avoid the 10-20% transmission losses through long transmission lines. For radio frequency transmission, the receiving antennas are transparent to sunlight, allowing farming of the land beneath the receiving antenna. Power transmission can be switched from one place to another to follow demand.

The cost of satellite solar power stations is determined primarily by the cost of transportation to low Earth orbit. Because of remarkable progress in the technology for low cost space transportation, we believe that costs will fall to a few percent of its present value within the next 15 years. That lower cost should make satellite solar power economically competitive for some applications, the National Security Space Office identified a need for satellite power stations with a capacity of 5 MW. A successful satellite solar power demonstration on this scale will provide demand to develop even lower-cost space transportation.

SSI believes, however, that the most cost effective satellite solar power stations will be built from materials mined from the Moon or asteroids. To make that argument, robust industrial processes to get engineering materials from the Moon are needed, and except for SSI’s work, little work on non terrestrial materials has been done. The Moon offers materials to build low technology and low-cost, but heavy, satellite solar power stations. The technology for electromagnetic launch from the Moon has improved enormously in the past three decades. An efficient mass driver using the SSI design could be constructed with the ultra-capacitors and high-power solid-state switches currently sold to the automotive market. A mass driver placed on the Moon could launch annually many thousands of tons of construction material for satellite power stations into high Earth orbit. The marginal cost for launching material from the moon to high Earth orbit is calculated to be a few percent of the cost of launching the same material from the Earth because the lunar escape energy is five per cent of that from the Earth and mass drivers are both cheaper and more efficient than rockets. See “The World’s Energy Future Belongs in Orbit” on ssi.org.

There are many possible technical options for power conversion in a power satellite. We do not know which of these options will be the most economical. It would be a grave mistake to prematurely specify the power generation subsystem. The government made that mistake with nuclear power, commercializing a system that had been optimized for military use. It would be a mistake to assume that either heat engines or thermionic conversion cannot compete with photovoltaic cells, particularly if most of the material to construct the power satellite is sourced from the Moon.

Satellite solar power is inherently geopolitically stabilizing. When economical power satellites are built, all countries will want them. All countries will therefore desire peace on the High Frontier. Power satellites are not vulnerable to terrorists, but they would be vulnerable to attacks by any of the major space faring powers.

The National Security Space Office has identified a tactical and strategic need for space solar power. It is unfortunate that one of the most promising eternal power sources is otherwise an orphan in the Federal Government.

Lee S. Valentine

New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications

Space Studies Institute is cosponsoring New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications III, an International Conference at Princeton University, August 16, 17 and 18.

For obvious reasons SSI has a particular interest in new types of low energy trajectories, motion near LaGrange points, halo orbits, weak stability boundaries and (relatively) low thrust transfers. SSI has a project to develop small, cheap asteroid probes using a solar sail that could be used to fly by a large number of asteroids on a single mission, so we are particularly interested in mission concepts incorporating low energy trajectories as well as the underlying numerical methods and algorithms for orbit and trajectory optimization.

The conference homepage is www.math.princeton.edu/astrocon/body_cfp.htm The speaker list is excellent and the preceding conferences have been very productive. I hope to see many SSI associates there.

SSI Executive Vice President Lee Valentine will give a talk. For the abstract, Continue reading New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications

A contest for astropreneurs

Friday, June 23, 2006 7:22 PM by Alan Boyle at Cosmic Log

It may not be as heady as the X Prize, but the Space Frontier Foundation is planning what you might call the B Prize for space-related business plans. The payoff for the best pitch? Entrepreneurial glory … plus a $1,000 poker chip, awarded by an investor at the foundation’s annual conference in Las Vegas next month. XCOR Aerospace’s Rich Pournelle, a guy who is well-versed in the world of space entrepreneurship, sent along the call for entries for the NewSpace 2006 Business Plan Competition.

Pournelle emphasized that the entries need not be restricted to rocket ships. “It only has to be space-related,” he told me. “For example, if it’s a rocket-powered car, we would consider the business plan. Or materials science, or solar power technology that might be used in satellites, or remote sensing, or any kind of life support systems. Any of that kind of stuff, we would consider.”

Here’s the language from the call for entries, which will be posted on the Space Frontier Foundation‘s Web site as well: “Entrepreneurial space companies who are interested in participating in this rewarding competition are asked to submit a 1-3 page executive summary of their plan by July 10 to amaresh.kollipara@gmail.com.  Amaresh Kollipara is an entrepreneur and a former Accenture executive who will screen the entries. 

Read the rest at Cosmic Log

Continue reading A contest for astropreneurs

Program for ISDC 2006

Here is the finalized program for Space Studies Institute’s track at ISDC 2006.

Thursday May 4, 2006

2:00 P.M.
Klaus Heiss: The Shuttle Decision Revisited and the Jamestown Proposal

2:30 P.M.
Lee Valentine: A Space Roadmap: a Profitable, Incremental Approach to Space Industrialization and Space Settlement

3:00 P.M.
Red Whittaker: The Grand Challenge and Recent Advances in Space Robotics

4:00 P.M.
Niklas Jarvstrat: Building a Self Reliant Moon Colony

4:30 P.M.
Alex Freundlich et al: Turning the Moon into A Solar Photovoltaic Paradise

5:00
Peter Schubert: Synergistic Construction Mechanisms for Habitats in Space Environs

5:30
Al Globus: Kalpana One: A New Space Colony Design

Friday May 5, 2006

3:00 P.M.-5:00 P.M.
Gary Barnhard: Architecting the Future
Masse Bloomfield: Space – The Endless Frontier
Brian Enke: The Medusa Approach to Mars Exploration and Settlement
Pamela Conrad: Making the Vision Real: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Space Exploration
Sherry E. Bell: Evolutionary Psychology and Its Implications for the Future of Humans in Space

5:00 P.M.
Pascal Lee: Astronaut Training for Moon and Mars Surface

5:30 P.M.
Greg Allison: Human Destiny – Why We Must Choose to Settle Space Now to Survive

Saturday May 6, 2006

2:00 P.M.
Hirdy Miyamoto: Granular materials on the surface of the small asteroid Itokawa: Initial results of the Japanese Hayabusa mission

2:30 P.M.
Jeff Kargel: Martian resources supporting expansion of a self-sustaining Mars outpost

3:00 P.M.
Phil Sadler: Thermal Well for ISRU Water Extraction from Lunar/Martian Permafrost

3:30 P.M.
James Dohm et al.: Tier-scalable Reconnaissance To Test Overarching Geological Theories and Locate Prime Targets on Mars

4:00 P.M.
Wolfgang Fink et al.: Tier-Scalable Reconnaissance for Remote Planetary Exploration

4:30 P.M.
Roberto Furfaro: Autonomy in Planetary Exploration: Fuzzy Expert System for Tier-Scalable Reconnaissance

5:00 P.M.
William Jewell: A Proposal for an All Biological CELSS: Phase 2 of the Cornell/SSI Collaboration

Sunday May 7, 2006

11:00 A.M.
Giorgio Gaviraghi: Artificial Planets

11:30 A.M.
Phil Putman: An Orbiting Magnetic Arrest System for Rocket-free Transportation to Earth Orbit