COMMON1 CATIONS PERFORMANCE CRITERIA COMPUTER PFRFORMAHCF CRITERIA.. Figure 5. SENSOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA • VIDEO CHANNEL NOISE • SCAN JITTER • DYNAMIC RANGE REDUCTION • RESOLUTION REDUCTION • DISCRIMINATION FEATURE UNCERTAINTIES • I/O CHANNEL NOISE • CONTROL NOISE - PULSE JITTER • MULTIPOINT ROUTINE ERRORS • TARGE I DETECTION RANGE • TARGET ID DELAYS • TRACK ACQUISITION DELAYS • TRACK ERROR • BEAM CONTROL INSTABILITY RADAR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA • SIGNAL ACQUISITION DELAY • BER - SYNC/ ADDRESS, DATA EFFECTS • HUX NOISE FUNCTION COMMAMD/CONTROL AND UIEMETRY COMMUNICATIONS (MILITARY TEST RANGES) UTILITY AND PIPELINE CIIMMAND/CONTROL/TELEMETRY COMMUNICATIONS CHARACTERISTIC EFFECT ». SIGNAL ACQUISITION THRESHOLD: +5 TO 20% b. DATA ERROR: +5 TO 28% c. SYNC LOSS PROBABILITY: +3 TO 25% ». SIGNAL ACQUISITION THRESHOLD: -5 TO 15% b. DATA ERROR: +10 TO 30% c. LINK NOISE: +5 TO 20% MOJAVE RECTENNA SITE ANALYSIS - SYSTEM IMPACT DATA CHARACTERISTIC EFFCCI A. COOPERATIVE TARGET ACQUISITION RANGE: -3 TO 20Z B. SKIM TARGET ACQUISITION RANGE: -13 TO 28Z c. COOPERATIVE TARGET TRACK ERROR: +15 TO ROZ D. SKIN TARGET TRACK ERROR: +22 TO 65Z E. LOSS OF TRACK LOOP LOCK (SKIN MODE) PROBABILITY INCREASE: +10 TO ROZ FUNCTION INSTRUMENTATION RADAR (MILITARY TEST RANGES) MOJAVE RECTENNA SITE ANALYSIS - SYSTEM IMPACT DATA Figure 6.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU5NjU0Mg==