REFERENCES 1. SPS Concept Development and Evaluation Program Reference System Report, U.S. Dept, of Energy and NASA, DOE/ER-0023 (Oct. 1978). 2. Wolsko, T., et al., A Preliminary Assessment of the Satellite Power System (SPS) and Six Other Energy Technologies, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/AA-20 (Apr. 1980). 3. Wolsko, T., et al., A Methodology for the Comparative Assessment of the Satellite Power System (SPS) and Alternative Technologies, U.S. Dept, of Energy Report DOE/ER-0051 (Jan. 1980). 4. TRW, Energy Systems Planning Division, Characterizations of Alternative Electric Generation Technologies for the SPS Comparative Assessment: Central-Station Technologies, Vols. 1 and 2, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/EES-TM-121 (Aug. 1980). 5. Satellite Power System and Alternative Technology Characterization, United Engineers and Constructors UE&C-ANL-790831 (Aug. 1979). 6. Samsa, M., Selection of Alternative Central Station Technologies for the Satellite Power System Comparative Assessment, U.S. Dept, of Energy Report D0E-ER-0052 (Apr. 1980). 7. Solar Power Satellite System Definition Study, Volume I, Phase 1, Final Report, Boeing Aerospace Corporation D180-25037-1 (Feb. 1979). 8. Satellite Power Systems (SPS) Concept Definition Study, (Exhibit C) Final Performance Review, Rockwell International Corporation SSD79-0076 (Mar. 1979). 9. Marsh, W.D., Requirement Assessments of Photovoltaic Power Plants in Electric Utility Systems, Vols. 1-3, General Electric Company, EPRI Report ER-685 (June 1978). 10. Commercial Electric Power Cost Studies - Capital Cost: High and Low Sulfur Coal Plants - 1200 MWe, Vols. 1 and 2, United Engineers and Constructors for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Dept, of Energy, NUREG-0243, COO-2477-7 (June 1977). 11. Summary Report Sulfur Oxides Control Technology Series: Flue Gas Desulfurization Wellman-Lord Process, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA 625/8-79-001 (Feb. 1979). 12. Brown, D.H., Conceptual Design and Implementation Assessment of a Utility Steam Plant with Conventional Furnace and Wet Lime Gas Scrubbers, Energy Conversion Alternatives Study (ECAS), General Electric Company for NASA, CR-1350 (Dec. 1976). 13. Utility Boiler Design/Cost Comparison: Fluidized Bed Combustion versus Flue-Gas Desulfurization, Tennessee Valley Authority for the USEPA, EPA 600/77-126 (Nov. 1977).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU5NjU0Mg==