76 • Rationale: It is generally understood that SBSP is highly cost prohibitive with today’s costs, and technically infeasible with today’s technology. Simply for comparison, we apply more of today’s costs and capabilities. • Result: Fiscal costs are increased 5.3 times for RD1 and 4.5 times for RD2. Emissions per kWh for both systems increase by a factor of 10. Table 26. All Sensitivity Analysis Results Sensitivity Analysis Grouping Technology / Scenario LCOE ($/kWh) Emissions Intensity (gCO2eq./kWh) Baseline RD1 Baseline 0.6 26.6 RD2 Baseline 1.6 40.4 Launch RD1 Lower Launch Costs ($50M) 0.4 26.6 RD1 Lower Launch Costs ($10M) 0.2 26.6 RD2 Lower Launch Costs ($50M) 1 40.4 RD2 Lower Launch Costs ($100M) 0.5 40.4 RD1 Direct to GEO 0.3 24.4 RD2 Direct to GEO 0.8 36.6 RD1 Electric Propulsion Orbital Transfer 0.2 11.4 RD2 Electric Propulsion Orbital Transfer 0.5 14.2 Manufacturing RD1 Extended Component Lifetime 0.5 19.3 RD2 Extended Component Lifetime 1.2 28.8 RD1 Lower Hardware Cost 0.5 19.5 RD2 Lower Hardware Cost 1.3 32.3 RD1 Lower Manufacturing Learning 0.6 22.6
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU5NjU0Mg==