Figure 5. Two-dimensional metal reflector arrangements with the potential of supporting multiple reflections (a) Hot spots near 90° corner reflector (b) Opposing folded metal surfaces (c) Closed multi-angled box with aperture (Harvey, 1970) Table 5. Conversion Table for Return Loss a , Reflection Coefficient p, Standing Wave RadiorSWR, and Peak-to-Peak Field Stength Variations (l±x) Relative to Unity Reference.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU5NjU0Mg==