Space Solar Power Review Vol 6 Num 3 1986

Los Alamos Scientific Lab. , N. Mex . Corp. Source Codes L4453961 1984. 7P. Presentation Note: Presented at Linear Accelerator Conf., Darmstadt-Seeheim, West Germany, 7 May 1984. Report No.: DE84-011412; LA-UR-84-1359 Contract No.: W-7405-ENG-36 Language: Eng1ish. Country, of Origin: United States. Country of Publication: U n i t e d S t a t e s Document Type: CONFERENCE PAPER Most documents available from AIAA Technical Library Other Availability: NTIS HC A02/MF AOI Journa1 Announ c emen t: STAR8420 Cur rent work on 1i n ear particle acc el erat or s is placed in historical and physics contexts, and applications driving the state of the art are discussed. Future needs and the ways they may force development are outlined in terms of research and development challenges presented to accelerator designers. (DOE) Source of Abstract (Subfile): DOE Descriptors: *DESIGN ANALYSIS; *LINEAR ACCELERATORS; *PARTICLE ACCELERATORS; ^RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; *TECHNOLOGICAL FORECAST ING; ^TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COST ANALYSIS; ELECTRON BEAMS; ENERGY CONVERSION EFFICIENCY; FABRICATION; TRADEOFFS Subject Classification: 7572 Atomic Molecu1ar Physics (1975—) Development and support structures for high-power solar arrays. KNAPP, K. Astro Research Corp. , Santa Barbara, Calif. Corp. Source Code: A4918613 In NASA. Lewis Research Center Space Photovo1taic Res. and Technol. 1983 p 193-204 (SEE N84-29307 19-44). 1984. Language: Eng1i sh. Cou.fitry of 0r i gi n: United States. Country of Pub1ication: United St a tes Document Type: CONFERENCE PAPER Must documents available from AIAA Technical Library Other Availability: NTIS HC A12/MF AOI Journal Announcement: STAR8419 A number of structurally efficient configurations for wing-type solar arrays are developed by a combination of deepening the pl anform of the blanket and structure and by partitioning the blanket with battens and frequent a11 achments to the support st ructure. This techn i que reduces the tension required to avoid a low natural frequency for the blanket, and the load reduction results in a lighter structure. The use of three different structures are investigated: the Astromast., the Extendible Support Structure (ESS), and a new beam called the STACBEAM (Stacking Triangular Articulated Compact Beam) and their relative performances are compared. The investigation of the STACBEAM is emphasized because its sequential

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU5NjU0Mg==